Ideological features in Kenya Supreme Court judgments/ (Record no. 88304)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02395nam a22002177a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field KE-MeUCS
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20221128124957.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221128b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
Source
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency
Transcribing agency KE-MeUCS
Modifying agency KE-MeUCS
050 ## - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER
Classification number
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ndumia, Elijah Chege
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Ideological features in Kenya Supreme Court judgments/
Statement of responsibility, etc Elijah Chege Ndumia
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Meru:
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Meru University of Science and Technology,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2022.
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement MUSTIC2022
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Legal discourse is characterized by unique grammatical, lexical and stylistic features which are meant to enhance clarity and precision in the legal content. However, from a critical perspective, some of the discursive and stylistic features used alienate the common person and elevate judges and lawyers to an ideological pedestal. This study undertook a Critical Discourse Analysis of Kenya Supreme Court judgements on election petitions and civil cases with a view to investigate the discursive features used to represent legal ideology. The study was guided by Critical Discourse Analysis theory and a qualitative research design was used. The population for this study comprised the judgements made by the Kenya Supreme Court since its inception in 2010. Purposive sampling was used to identify five judgements on election petitions and civil cases. Guided by the CDA theory, features representing legal ideology were explored and discussed. The features include use of lexical stylistic features, performative verbs, legitimation, presuppositions, argumentation, interrogative forms, metaphors, precedence and predication. These features were meant to create precision and authority in the Supreme Court judgements. However, from a critical perspective, it was imminent that the features led to elevation of judges and lawyers as custodians of justice while the ordinary person was excluded from the legal process. The insight from this study is applicable to Forensic Linguistics and legal drafting. Judges and lawyers ought to use language in such a way that the common person is not excluded. Technical terminology should be used when necessary more so in contexts that involve only the legal personnel. In legal contexts that involves the ordinary person, plain language should be used.
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Ireri, Humphrey Kirimi
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Atieno, Christine
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Library of Congress Classification
Koha item type Article
Cataloguer Mercy Musungu
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Cataloger Total Checkouts Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Library of Congress Classification     Meru University Meru University Periodical Section 28/11/2022 Mercy Musungu   28/11/2022 28/11/2022 Article

Meru University of Science and Technology | P.O. Box 972-60200 Meru. | Tel 020 2092048 Fax 0208027449 | Email: library@must.ac.ke